Staffing Agencies
One notice process across every client account, branch and state you place into.
Solutions
Solutions for candidate notice workflows that need proof
One place to send candidate notices, watch them land, and pull the proof later. Built for staffing agencies and high-volume employers running AI screening across a lot of roles at once.
Built for high-volume recruiting operations
The moment your team spans more than one branch, one client account and one screening tool, candidate notices stop being a task and start being a process. Notice Tracking gives that process a system of record, and leaves the rest of your recruiting stack alone.
Healthcare Staffing
Urgent requisitions and credentialing steps, without losing the notice record along the way.
Industrial Staffing
High-throughput hourly hiring, where the same workflow runs hundreds of times a week.
Call Center Recruiting
Large applicant pools moving through the same screening steps, from one central team.
Logistics Staffing
Warehouse, delivery, transportation and supply chain pipelines that move faster than the paperwork.
What staffing teams are actually trying to fix
The same story comes up on nearly every call. Candidate data sits in the ATS. The approved wording sits on a shared drive. Delivery records sit inside an email tool nobody logs into. And when a client asks for proof, all three get stitched together by hand. Notice Tracking is built for exactly that: send the approved notice, track what happened to it, keep the history, and export it when you are asked.
We have the policy, but not the proof.
You have the wording. What you do not have is a way to show which version reached which candidate, and on what date.
Our records are spread across too many systems.
Candidate data in the ATS. Notices out of an email tool. Templates on a shared drive. Delivery records somewhere none of your recruiters can reach.
We do not want to replace our ATS.
You do not have to. Notice Tracking runs beside the ATS and takes only the notice, the delivery record and the export.
Manual tracking does not scale.
Spreadsheets and inbox searches hold up right until a second branch and a third client account arrive.
We need evidence, not another dashboard.
When someone asks, you need a file: notice version, candidate, delivery event, timestamp, who did it, and what happened next.
We need controls before notices go out.
Approved templates, a review step and version history, all in place before the first real send.
See where your candidate notice workflow has gaps.
Six questions. At the end you will know where your templates, candidate records, delivery events and evidence stop connecting.
Where the line sits
Your counsel decides what the law requires and approves the wording. Your auditor handles any bias audit. Notice Tracking runs the approved notice workflow and keeps the records that show what happened.